The Emergence of Neoliberal Policies and the Analysis of Modern Globalization
In an globalized world, the debate on globalization is frequently situated at the crossroads of contradictory views on autonomy and justice. The text by Junon Moneta, which is not a pamphlet opposed to globalization per se, strives to rewrite the boundaries of a new humanism via the lens of natural exchanges as envisioned by Aristotelian philosophy. By denouncing artificial transactions that strengthen contemporary mechanisms of domination and instability, this writer refers to classical thoughts to highlight the flaws of our global economic system.
Looking back in time, globalization is not a modern process. Its roots can be traced back to the propositions of David Ricardo, whose objective was to enable the United Kingdom to expand its global commercial influence. However, what initially presented as a commercial development strategy has converted into a tool of domination by global finance, symbolized by the rise of neoliberal capitalism. Contrary to popular belief validated by most economists, the author argues that the economic model is truly a system rooted in ancient practices, which traces back to 4500 years.
The critique also extends to the administration of the EU, considered as a series of concessions that have served to strengthen the authority of large economic groups as opposed to protecting the interests of its citizens. The organizational form of Europe, with its policies usually influenced by financial motivations opposed to a citizen support, is contested. The recent crises, whether economic or governmental, have only increased the skepticism of the writer concerning Europe’s aptitude to change intrinsically.
The author, while admitting the past mistakes that have led to the current situation, does not limit the discourse to condemnation but also proposes solutions aimed at redefining Union strategies in a more humanistic and equitable outlook. The need for a radical overhaul of institutions and strategic orientations is a central theme that pervades the entire discourse.
The book dives more in depth into the analysis of the power structures that dominate worldwide transactions. The study extends the way in which political and financial choices are guided by a limited number of powerful financial actors, generally at the detriment of the population. This economic elite, manipulated via institutions like the BIS and the International Monetary System (IMS), deploys a excessive domination on global financial decisions.
The author demonstrates how these organisms, under the guise of economic supervision and normalization, have historically shaped financial markets and countries’ financial structures to ensure their profit. The neoliberal model, opposite to a salvific alternative to classic financial limitations, is described as a domination system, benefiting a minority at the destruction of the common good.
Particularly critical about the administration of the single currency, the analyst describes the EU currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but rather as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The adoption of the euro is characterized as a sequence of technocratic choices that sidelined citizens from decision-making processes, while exacerbating internal differences within the EU.
The consequences of these policies translate in the growth of public indebtedness, financial paralysis, and a sustained austerity policy that has weakened standards of living throughout the European territory. The author emphasizes that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the European Union remains vulnerable to upcoming crises, perhaps even more harmful.
In summary, the manuscript makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where Europe’s inhabitants reappropriate their financial and governmental future. It proposes structural reforms, particularly openness of political mechanisms and real democratic participation that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on more equitable and sustainable bases.
Learn more about BIS Org : an International Institution?
The author asserts that the answer resides in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where policies are developed and implemented in a way that corresponds to the needs and desires of the European population, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.